Corruption, Clients, and Political Machines


Stephen E. Sachs

Responding to Samuel Issacharoff, On Political Corruption, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 118 (2010)

In his comment on political corruption, Professor Samuel Issacharoff questions traditional accounts that aim to squeeze money out of politics entirely. Instead, he focuses on the danger that political spending will promote private influence over government policy. In this response, Professor Stephen E. Sachs argues that "private influence" is itself too broad a category to control, and that campaign finance policy should be restricted to a more manageable scope. Professor Sachs argues that if protecting the government from private influence is too diffuse a goal, we can at least attempt to protect the government from itself, by ensuring that it does not channel public resources into self-sustaining political machines.

124 Harv. L. Rev. F. 62 (2011) | DOWNLOAD PDF

This comment form is powered by GentleSource Comment Script. It can be included in PHP or HTML files and allows visitors to leave comments on the website.
Online Forum

Responding to Jody Freeman and Jim Rossi, Agency Coordination in Shared Regulatory Space, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1131 (2012)

The More the Merrier: Multiple Agencies and the Future of Administrative Law Scholarship

Eric Biber



Reaction

Salvaging Perry

Andrew Koppelman


Responding to James Q. Whitman, The Free Market and the Prison, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1212 (2012)

On the American Paradox of Laissez Faire and Mass Incarceration

Bernard E. Harcourt



Responding to Rebecca Tushnet, Worth a Thousand Words: The Images of Copyright, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 683 (2012)

More Than a Thousand Words in Response to Rebecca Tushnet

Christina Spiesel






Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)